Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal concerning reopening of assessments under s.147 and additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share application money and unsecured loans. The Tribunal found that the AO mechanically issued s.148 notice based on information from the Investigation Wing without proper application of mind, despite all information being available in the previously completed s.143(3) assessment. Regarding share capital, the assessee had discharged its onus under s.68 by providing documentation establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. For unsecured loans, the Tribunal noted their repayment within a short period, and that the Revenue's case relied on a retracted statement of Mukesh Banka, which could not form the basis for additions per jurisdictional precedent.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal concerning reopening of assessments under s.147 and additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share application money and unsecured loans. The Tribunal found that the AO mechanically issued s.148 notice based on information from the Investigation Wing without proper application of mind, despite all information being available in the previously completed s.143(3) assessment. Regarding share capital, the assessee had discharged its onus under s.68 by providing documentation establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. For unsecured loans, the Tribunal noted their repayment within a short period, and that the Revenue's case relied on a retracted statement of Mukesh Banka, which could not form the basis for additions per jurisdictional precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
