Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
In a case concerning LTCG on sale of inherited agricultural land, the ITAT determined that the appropriate cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 should be Rs. 150 per sq. yard, calculated by applying a 57% increase to the 1962 value of Rs. 85. The AO was directed to recalculate the indexed cost accordingly. Regarding deduction u/s 54F, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for property purchased in his widowed mother's name, noting the peculiar inheritance circumstances. The Tribunal recognized that under Hindu Succession Act principles, apportioning the sale consideration would result in tax neutrality since the mother's portion was invested in property qualifying for deduction u/s 54F. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
In a case concerning LTCG on sale of inherited agricultural land, the ITAT determined that the appropriate cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 should be Rs. 150 per sq. yard, calculated by applying a 57% increase to the 1962 value of Rs. 85. The AO was directed to recalculate the indexed cost accordingly. Regarding deduction u/s 54F, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for property purchased in his widowed mother's name, noting the peculiar inheritance circumstances. The Tribunal recognized that under Hindu Succession Act principles, apportioning the sale consideration would result in tax neutrality since the mother's portion was invested in property qualifying for deduction u/s 54F. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
