Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the period of limitation for reopening assessments under Section 153C read with Section 153A must be calculated from the end of the assessment year relevant to the financial year in which the reopening action was initiated (i.e., when the Section 148 notice was issued). Since the assessment year in question (AY 2014-15) fell beyond the ten-year limitation period contemplated in these provisions, the Court allowed the petition and set aside the impugned notice as time-barred. This ruling clarifies how the block period for reopening assessments should be determined when applying limitation provisions.
The HC held that the period of limitation for reopening assessments under Section 153C read with Section 153A must be calculated from the end of the assessment year relevant to the financial year in which the reopening action was initiated (i.e., when the Section 148 notice was issued). Since the assessment year in question (AY 2014-15) fell beyond the ten-year limitation period contemplated in these provisions, the Court allowed the petition and set aside the impugned notice as time-barred. This ruling clarifies how the block period for reopening assessments should be determined when applying limitation provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
