Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
The HC dismissed a habeas corpus petition challenging detention under COFEPOSA Act for gold smuggling from Myanmar. Despite being granted bail in the criminal case, the petitioner's preventive detention was upheld as legally distinct from punitive measures. The court relied on Ameena Begum (2024) which established parameters for judicial review of preventive detention orders. Following Saraswathi Seshagiri (1982), the court affirmed that past smuggling activities could indicate future conduct warranting preventive detention, particularly in international smuggling cases where standard prosecution might be impractical. The court rejected claims of delayed service, confirming the detention order was properly executed on March 11, 2024, and that all constitutional, statutory, and procedural safeguards were followed.
The HC dismissed a habeas corpus petition challenging detention under COFEPOSA Act for gold smuggling from Myanmar. Despite being granted bail in the criminal case, the petitioner's preventive detention was upheld as legally distinct from punitive measures. The court relied on Ameena Begum (2024) which established parameters for judicial review of preventive detention orders. Following Saraswathi Seshagiri (1982), the court affirmed that past smuggling activities could indicate future conduct warranting preventive detention, particularly in international smuggling cases where standard prosecution might be impractical. The court rejected claims of delayed service, confirming the detention order was properly executed on March 11, 2024, and that all constitutional, statutory, and procedural safeguards were followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
