Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The AAAR upheld the AAR's ruling that services provided by the appellant to the Telangana State Government are not exempt under GST. Entry 6 of Notification 12/2017 exempts services provided by the Government, not to the Government. Additionally, services provided by the appellant on behalf of the Government to business entities fall under the exception to this entry and are therefore taxable. The appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit (filed on 1.11.2021, within 30 days of AAR communication on 4.10.2021). The appellant's representatives confirmed during the hearing that GST has been paid on these services since inception, indicating no practical dispute exists.
The AAAR upheld the AAR's ruling that services provided by the appellant to the Telangana State Government are not exempt under GST. Entry 6 of Notification 12/2017 exempts services provided by the Government, not to the Government. Additionally, services provided by the appellant on behalf of the Government to business entities fall under the exception to this entry and are therefore taxable. The appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit (filed on 1.11.2021, within 30 days of AAR communication on 4.10.2021). The appellant's representatives confirmed during the hearing that GST has been paid on these services since inception, indicating no practical dispute exists.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
