Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC ruled that assignment of leasehold rights in MIDC land along with buildings to a third party for lump sum consideration is not subject to GST. Following Gujarat HC's precedent in Gujarat Chambers of Commerce case, the court determined that such transactions constitute transfer of benefits arising from "immovable property," with the assignee becoming the new lessee in place of the original allottee. The court held that Section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act read with clause 5(b) of Schedule II and clause 5 of Schedule III does not apply to such transactions, exempting them from GST under Section 9. The HC stayed adjudication of the Show Cause Notice dated November 13, 2024.
The HC ruled that assignment of leasehold rights in MIDC land along with buildings to a third party for lump sum consideration is not subject to GST. Following Gujarat HC's precedent in Gujarat Chambers of Commerce case, the court determined that such transactions constitute transfer of benefits arising from "immovable property," with the assignee becoming the new lessee in place of the original allottee. The court held that Section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act read with clause 5(b) of Schedule II and clause 5 of Schedule III does not apply to such transactions, exempting them from GST under Section 9. The HC stayed adjudication of the Show Cause Notice dated November 13, 2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
