Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration by respondent No.4, who had rejected petitioner's claim under various GST circulars solely on grounds of insufficient documentation. The court determined that petitioner should be given another opportunity to file additional pleadings and documents for reconsideration. Following reassessment, petitioner would be entitled to apply for benefits under the Amnesty scheme under Section 128A of the CGST Act, which the concerned respondent must consider in accordance with law. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the substantive merits of the rival contentions.
The HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration by respondent No.4, who had rejected petitioner's claim under various GST circulars solely on grounds of insufficient documentation. The court determined that petitioner should be given another opportunity to file additional pleadings and documents for reconsideration. Following reassessment, petitioner would be entitled to apply for benefits under the Amnesty scheme under Section 128A of the CGST Act, which the concerned respondent must consider in accordance with law. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the substantive merits of the rival contentions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
