Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration by respondent No.4, who had rejected petitioner's claim under various GST circulars solely on grounds of insufficient documentation. The court determined that petitioner should be given another opportunity to file additional pleadings and documents for reconsideration. Following reassessment, petitioner would be entitled to apply for benefits under the Amnesty scheme under Section 128A of the CGST Act, which the concerned respondent must consider in accordance with law. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the substantive merits of the rival contentions.
The HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration by respondent No.4, who had rejected petitioner's claim under various GST circulars solely on grounds of insufficient documentation. The court determined that petitioner should be given another opportunity to file additional pleadings and documents for reconsideration. Following reassessment, petitioner would be entitled to apply for benefits under the Amnesty scheme under Section 128A of the CGST Act, which the concerned respondent must consider in accordance with law. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the substantive merits of the rival contentions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
