Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the impugned assessment order violated principles of natural justice and suffered from non-application of mind. Despite the petitioner filing multiple replies on 28.10.2023, 21.11.2023, 29.11.2023, and 18.12.2023 to the Show Cause Notice, the authority failed to consider these submissions or even reference them in the final order. Additionally, no opportunity for personal hearing was provided to the petitioner before passing the order. The Court determined that this constituted a gross violation of natural justice principles and demonstrated failure to properly consider material evidence on record. The petition was accordingly disposed of in favor of the petitioner.
The HC held that the impugned assessment order violated principles of natural justice and suffered from non-application of mind. Despite the petitioner filing multiple replies on 28.10.2023, 21.11.2023, 29.11.2023, and 18.12.2023 to the Show Cause Notice, the authority failed to consider these submissions or even reference them in the final order. Additionally, no opportunity for personal hearing was provided to the petitioner before passing the order. The Court determined that this constituted a gross violation of natural justice principles and demonstrated failure to properly consider material evidence on record. The petition was accordingly disposed of in favor of the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
