Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging SEBI's attachment orders against an unregistered Collective Investment Scheme, ruling that the petitioner must exhaust the statutory appellate remedy under the SEBI Act before seeking judicial review. The Court determined that all grounds raised could be addressed by the Appellate Authority. While acknowledging that the limitation period for appeal had expired, the HC granted the petitioner a 30-day extension from the judgment date to file an appeal, directing that any such appeal should not be rejected on grounds of limitation given the case's unique circumstances.
The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging SEBI's attachment orders against an unregistered Collective Investment Scheme, ruling that the petitioner must exhaust the statutory appellate remedy under the SEBI Act before seeking judicial review. The Court determined that all grounds raised could be addressed by the Appellate Authority. While acknowledging that the limitation period for appeal had expired, the HC granted the petitioner a 30-day extension from the judgment date to file an appeal, directing that any such appeal should not be rejected on grounds of limitation given the case's unique circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.