Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The ITAT ruled that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions outside the scope of limited scrutiny without obtaining mandatory permission from the PCIT/Pr.CIT to convert it to complete scrutiny. In this case, the AO improperly made a deemed dividend addition under section 2(22)(e) without such permission, violating binding CBDT circulars. The Tribunal held that since the addition pertained to an issue not included in the limited scrutiny parameters, it could not be sustained. The additional ground raised by the appellant was allowed, and the ITAT directed the deletion of the section 2(22)(e) addition, deciding in favor of the appellant.
The ITAT ruled that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions outside the scope of limited scrutiny without obtaining mandatory permission from the PCIT/Pr.CIT to convert it to complete scrutiny. In this case, the AO improperly made a deemed dividend addition under section 2(22)(e) without such permission, violating binding CBDT circulars. The Tribunal held that since the addition pertained to an issue not included in the limited scrutiny parameters, it could not be sustained. The additional ground raised by the appellant was allowed, and the ITAT directed the deletion of the section 2(22)(e) addition, deciding in favor of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
