Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC quashed orders reversing ITC claims based on time limitations, following its precedent in W.P.Nos.25081 of 2023. The court determined that the retrospective amendment to Section 16 of the CGST Act, specifically the insertion of sub-section (5) effective from 01.07.2017, entitles petitioners to avail ITC for GSTR-3B returns filed for FYs 2017-18 through 2020-21 on or before 30.11.2021. The court directed the respondent-Department to de-freeze bank accounts and cease recovery actions, thereby allowing the petition and establishing that the retrospective amendment overrides the original limitation period in Section 16(4).
The HC quashed orders reversing ITC claims based on time limitations, following its precedent in W.P.Nos.25081 of 2023. The court determined that the retrospective amendment to Section 16 of the CGST Act, specifically the insertion of sub-section (5) effective from 01.07.2017, entitles petitioners to avail ITC for GSTR-3B returns filed for FYs 2017-18 through 2020-21 on or before 30.11.2021. The court directed the respondent-Department to de-freeze bank accounts and cease recovery actions, thereby allowing the petition and establishing that the retrospective amendment overrides the original limitation period in Section 16(4).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
