Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of two additions made by the AO. First, interest earned from deposits was correctly held to be inextricably linked with setting up the plant, following Bokaro Steels Limited (1998), and thus not taxable as "Income from other sources." Second, the Tribunal confirmed deletion of share premium disallowance under s. 56(2)(viib), as the shares were issued to an existing shareholder whose identity and creditworthiness were established. The valuation of Rs. 12 per share was properly determined using the DCF method prescribed by RBI, and the AO had not disputed this valuation methodology. Appeal decided against Revenue.
ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of two additions made by the AO. First, interest earned from deposits was correctly held to be inextricably linked with setting up the plant, following Bokaro Steels Limited (1998), and thus not taxable as "Income from other sources." Second, the Tribunal confirmed deletion of share premium disallowance under s. 56(2)(viib), as the shares were issued to an existing shareholder whose identity and creditworthiness were established. The valuation of Rs. 12 per share was properly determined using the DCF method prescribed by RBI, and the AO had not disputed this valuation methodology. Appeal decided against Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.