Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
The HC directed respondent No. 1 to consider the petitioner's representations regarding non-payment of GST and other alleged offenses by respondent No. 2. A speaking order must be issued within two weeks, with discretion given to respondent No. 1 to hear both parties before making the determination. The petition was allowed, though the Court did not directly order registration of an FIR as requested, instead mandating proper consideration of the petitioner's complaints through appropriate administrative channels with a time-bound resolution requirement.
The HC directed respondent No. 1 to consider the petitioner's representations regarding non-payment of GST and other alleged offenses by respondent No. 2. A speaking order must be issued within two weeks, with discretion given to respondent No. 1 to hear both parties before making the determination. The petition was allowed, though the Court did not directly order registration of an FIR as requested, instead mandating proper consideration of the petitioner's complaints through appropriate administrative channels with a time-bound resolution requirement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
