PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The ITAT held that the final assessment order passed on 28.02.2023 was barred by limitation and therefore void. Per Section 144C(13), the Assessing Officer must pass the final order within one month from the end of the month in which DRP directions are received. In this case, DRP directions were received on 07.06.2022, making the deadline 31.07.2022. The TPO's effect order dated 14.07.2022 did not extend this limitation period. Additionally, the ITAT noted procedural irregularity as the draft assessment order was issued by the Faceless Assessment Centre while the final order was passed by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, deviating from the faceless assessment system. Appeal decided in assessee's favor.
The ITAT held that the final assessment order passed on 28.02.2023 was barred by limitation and therefore void. Per Section 144C(13), the Assessing Officer must pass the final order within one month from the end of the month in which DRP directions are received. In this case, DRP directions were received on 07.06.2022, making the deadline 31.07.2022. The TPO's effect order dated 14.07.2022 did not extend this limitation period. Additionally, the ITAT noted procedural irregularity as the draft assessment order was issued by the Faceless Assessment Centre while the final order was passed by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, deviating from the faceless assessment system. Appeal decided in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
