Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT set aside the enhancement order issued by CIT(A) under s.251(2) regarding LTCG and denial of s.54F deduction on sale of gold, ornaments, and silver utensils. The Tribunal held that s.251(2) provisions are mandatory, requiring reasonable opportunity of show cause before enhancement, relying on precedents from SC and other ITAT benches. Despite Revenue's contention that the appellant had failed to appear when the case was called and opportunities were granted, the Tribunal determined that sufficient opportunity was not provided before enhancement. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits after providing fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
The ITAT set aside the enhancement order issued by CIT(A) under s.251(2) regarding LTCG and denial of s.54F deduction on sale of gold, ornaments, and silver utensils. The Tribunal held that s.251(2) provisions are mandatory, requiring reasonable opportunity of show cause before enhancement, relying on precedents from SC and other ITAT benches. Despite Revenue's contention that the appellant had failed to appear when the case was called and opportunities were granted, the Tribunal determined that sufficient opportunity was not provided before enhancement. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits after providing fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
