Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the auction notice and denied stay of the impugned order. The Tribunal found no procedural flaws in the liquidation process, noting that appellant's Section 230 scheme was filed with a 224-day delay after the Stakeholders Committee had already rejected it. The liquidator properly conducted valuation according to IBC provisions and regulations, and the auction had attained finality with sale certificate issuance on 17.07.2023. The Tribunal affirmed that completed auction proceedings with issued sale certificates cannot be revisited based on belated procedural challenges, particularly when the appellant failed to establish any procedural irregularities in the auction process.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the auction notice and denied stay of the impugned order. The Tribunal found no procedural flaws in the liquidation process, noting that appellant's Section 230 scheme was filed with a 224-day delay after the Stakeholders Committee had already rejected it. The liquidator properly conducted valuation according to IBC provisions and regulations, and the auction had attained finality with sale certificate issuance on 17.07.2023. The Tribunal affirmed that completed auction proceedings with issued sale certificates cannot be revisited based on belated procedural challenges, particularly when the appellant failed to establish any procedural irregularities in the auction process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.