Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the auction notice and denied stay of the impugned order. The Tribunal found no procedural flaws in the liquidation process, noting that appellant's Section 230 scheme was filed with a 224-day delay after the Stakeholders Committee had already rejected it. The liquidator properly conducted valuation according to IBC provisions and regulations, and the auction had attained finality with sale certificate issuance on 17.07.2023. The Tribunal affirmed that completed auction proceedings with issued sale certificates cannot be revisited based on belated procedural challenges, particularly when the appellant failed to establish any procedural irregularities in the auction process.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the auction notice and denied stay of the impugned order. The Tribunal found no procedural flaws in the liquidation process, noting that appellant's Section 230 scheme was filed with a 224-day delay after the Stakeholders Committee had already rejected it. The liquidator properly conducted valuation according to IBC provisions and regulations, and the auction had attained finality with sale certificate issuance on 17.07.2023. The Tribunal affirmed that completed auction proceedings with issued sale certificates cannot be revisited based on belated procedural challenges, particularly when the appellant failed to establish any procedural irregularities in the auction process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.