Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled that Delayed Payment Charges (DPC) received by the appellant stockbroker from clients are not includible in the taxable value for service tax purposes. The Tribunal determined that DPCs constitute penal charges for delayed payments rather than consideration for providing a separate service. Applying principles established in Bhayana Builders and other precedents, CESTAT emphasized that "consideration" under Section 67 of the Finance Act must flow from the service recipient to the service provider as payment for services rendered. The Tribunal noted that Circular 137/25/2011 specifically clarifies that DPCs are not chargeable to service tax as they represent penalties rather than service fees. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
CESTAT ruled that Delayed Payment Charges (DPC) received by the appellant stockbroker from clients are not includible in the taxable value for service tax purposes. The Tribunal determined that DPCs constitute penal charges for delayed payments rather than consideration for providing a separate service. Applying principles established in Bhayana Builders and other precedents, CESTAT emphasized that "consideration" under Section 67 of the Finance Act must flow from the service recipient to the service provider as payment for services rendered. The Tribunal noted that Circular 137/25/2011 specifically clarifies that DPCs are not chargeable to service tax as they represent penalties rather than service fees. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
