Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The CESTAT partially allowed the appellant's appeal regarding CENVAT credit eligibility for various input services. The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit for AMC and warranty charges as these services were not integrally connected to manufacturing and occurred beyond the point of removal. However, it allowed credit for Business Auxiliary Services (based on previous unchallenged rulings), Import Services (qualifying as sales promotion activities), Club and Association Services (following precedents), and Storing and Warehousing charges (due to minimal amounts involved). The Tribunal rejected the invocation of the extended period of limitation, finding no deliberate attempt to evade duty or evidence of guilty intention. The ruling emphasized that input services must be integrally connected to manufacturing to qualify for CENVAT credit.
The CESTAT partially allowed the appellant's appeal regarding CENVAT credit eligibility for various input services. The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit for AMC and warranty charges as these services were not integrally connected to manufacturing and occurred beyond the point of removal. However, it allowed credit for Business Auxiliary Services (based on previous unchallenged rulings), Import Services (qualifying as sales promotion activities), Club and Association Services (following precedents), and Storing and Warehousing charges (due to minimal amounts involved). The Tribunal rejected the invocation of the extended period of limitation, finding no deliberate attempt to evade duty or evidence of guilty intention. The ruling emphasized that input services must be integrally connected to manufacturing to qualify for CENVAT credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
