Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The HC dismissed a petition challenging an attachment order issued under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act for unpaid tax dues. The court found that the petitioner's claim of exclusive ownership through nomination was legally untenable, as nomination does not confer full title to property. Despite being nominated after the intestate death of Madhusudan, the petitioner held the property in trust for all legal heirs per succession laws. The purported transfer of interest to the petitioner by her sons in June 2017 occurred after tax arrears accrued (FY 2008-09 and 2012-13), making the undivided share of her son Jayesh subject to Section 38 of the Act.
The HC dismissed a petition challenging an attachment order issued under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act for unpaid tax dues. The court found that the petitioner's claim of exclusive ownership through nomination was legally untenable, as nomination does not confer full title to property. Despite being nominated after the intestate death of Madhusudan, the petitioner held the property in trust for all legal heirs per succession laws. The purported transfer of interest to the petitioner by her sons in June 2017 occurred after tax arrears accrued (FY 2008-09 and 2012-13), making the undivided share of her son Jayesh subject to Section 38 of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
