Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC rejected bail for the applicant charged under Sections 3 & 4 of PMLA involving proceeds of crime exceeding 2000 crores. The court determined the applicant was a key player in a liquor syndicate that engaged in massive corruption within the Excise Department, causing substantial loss to the State Exchequer. Despite retraction statements by co-accused persons, the court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in money laundering activities. The applicant failed to satisfy the twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA, as the ED established reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was guilty of the offense. The bail application under Section 483 of BNSS read with Section 45 of PMLA was accordingly rejected.
The HC rejected bail for the applicant charged under Sections 3 & 4 of PMLA involving proceeds of crime exceeding 2000 crores. The court determined the applicant was a key player in a liquor syndicate that engaged in massive corruption within the Excise Department, causing substantial loss to the State Exchequer. Despite retraction statements by co-accused persons, the court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in money laundering activities. The applicant failed to satisfy the twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA, as the ED established reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was guilty of the offense. The bail application under Section 483 of BNSS read with Section 45 of PMLA was accordingly rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.