Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
CESTAT partially allowed the appellant's appeal against service tax demands. The Tribunal remanded the technical inspection service tax calculation for recomputation, recognizing excess payments had been ignored. It held that written-off advances cannot attract service tax, services rendered by appellant's Japan branch to an Indian client were subject to reverse charge mechanism, and electricity charges collected as a pure agent were not taxable. The demand for maintenance charges was appropriated against tax already paid. The extended limitation period was invalidated as no suppression of facts was established. The appeal was disposed of by remanding calculation issues to the adjudicating authority for verification based on the CA certificate.
CESTAT partially allowed the appellant's appeal against service tax demands. The Tribunal remanded the technical inspection service tax calculation for recomputation, recognizing excess payments had been ignored. It held that written-off advances cannot attract service tax, services rendered by appellant's Japan branch to an Indian client were subject to reverse charge mechanism, and electricity charges collected as a pure agent were not taxable. The demand for maintenance charges was appropriated against tax already paid. The extended limitation period was invalidated as no suppression of facts was established. The appeal was disposed of by remanding calculation issues to the adjudicating authority for verification based on the CA certificate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
