Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
HC set aside GST demand order dated 21.11.2024 for non-consideration of binding departmental circulars (No.200/12/2023-GST and No.236/30/2024-GST). Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for fresh consideration specifically accounting for these clarificatory circulars. Petitioner granted leave to file additional application demonstrating applicability of circular benefits to their case. The court determined that appellate remedy would be futile since the fundamental issue was non-consideration of binding administrative guidelines. Authority directed to pass fresh order after evaluating circular benefits as claimed by petitioner.
HC set aside GST demand order dated 21.11.2024 for non-consideration of binding departmental circulars (No.200/12/2023-GST and No.236/30/2024-GST). Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for fresh consideration specifically accounting for these clarificatory circulars. Petitioner granted leave to file additional application demonstrating applicability of circular benefits to their case. The court determined that appellate remedy would be futile since the fundamental issue was non-consideration of binding administrative guidelines. Authority directed to pass fresh order after evaluating circular benefits as claimed by petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
