Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC reviewed challenges to Garnishee Notice, Show Cause Notice, and notifications issued under Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017. Multiple similar petitions were pending across jurisdictions, with Gauhati HC striking down the contested notifications. While Telangana HC ruled favorably based on SC's limitation extension order, that decision faces appeal in SC. Given the complex jurisdictional landscape and pending matters before SC, HC determined petitioner established grounds for both admission and interim relief. The substantive questions regarding validity of notifications and limitation period remain subject to final determination by SC. Petition disposed of with interim protection granted.
HC reviewed challenges to Garnishee Notice, Show Cause Notice, and notifications issued under Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017. Multiple similar petitions were pending across jurisdictions, with Gauhati HC striking down the contested notifications. While Telangana HC ruled favorably based on SC's limitation extension order, that decision faces appeal in SC. Given the complex jurisdictional landscape and pending matters before SC, HC determined petitioner established grounds for both admission and interim relief. The substantive questions regarding validity of notifications and limitation period remain subject to final determination by SC. Petition disposed of with interim protection granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
