Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding additions under Section 68 and brokerage expense disallowance. The Tribunal held that revaluation of assets by AOP (DD Associates) and subsequent credit to assessee's capital account did not trigger taxable income, as no actual transfer or sale occurred. The revaluation merely recognized present value in books without creating tax liability. The share adjustment from 46.50% to 5% was legitimate accounting entry, not a tax avoidance scheme. Regarding brokerage expenses, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance since payments were made via cheque with TDS deduction and specific purpose was established. Both grounds decided in assessee's favor.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding additions under Section 68 and brokerage expense disallowance. The Tribunal held that revaluation of assets by AOP (DD Associates) and subsequent credit to assessee's capital account did not trigger taxable income, as no actual transfer or sale occurred. The revaluation merely recognized present value in books without creating tax liability. The share adjustment from 46.50% to 5% was legitimate accounting entry, not a tax avoidance scheme. Regarding brokerage expenses, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance since payments were made via cheque with TDS deduction and specific purpose was established. Both grounds decided in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4920 
