Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT quashed assessment order passed u/s 143(3) by ITO-4(1), Raipur due to invalid assumption of jurisdiction. The transfer of case from ITO-4(1), Kolkata to ITO-4(1), Raipur was held improper without requisite order u/s 127(2) from CIT, Kolkata-2. ITAT determined that under s.120, CIT Kolkata-2 lacked authority to transfer jurisdiction to an AO not subordinate to him. The claim based on order sheet noting dated 08.09.2014 regarding transfer pursuant to s.120 order was rejected. The assessment was invalidated as fundamental jurisdictional requirements under s.127 were not met. Appeal decided against Revenue.
ITAT quashed assessment order passed u/s 143(3) by ITO-4(1), Raipur due to invalid assumption of jurisdiction. The transfer of case from ITO-4(1), Kolkata to ITO-4(1), Raipur was held improper without requisite order u/s 127(2) from CIT, Kolkata-2. ITAT determined that under s.120, CIT Kolkata-2 lacked authority to transfer jurisdiction to an AO not subordinate to him. The claim based on order sheet noting dated 08.09.2014 regarding transfer pursuant to s.120 order was rejected. The assessment was invalidated as fundamental jurisdictional requirements under s.127 were not met. Appeal decided against Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.