Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC determined the appeal delay was justifiable in a GST input tax credit dispute. The appellant had deposited pre-requisite amounts before formal appeal dismissal. Manual filing was permissible in December 2022 with no prohibition notifications. Electronic filing was impossible until the order's upload on GST portal on 17.01.2023. The appellant complied with Section 107(6b) of CGST Act by depositing Rs.82,000 in GST Electronic Cash Ledger and submitting via speed post. The Court condoned the delay, noting substantial compliance with statutory requirements including 10% pre-deposit of tax liability. The procedural delay was deemed insufficient grounds for dismissal given the appellant's efforts to meet statutory obligations. Petition allowed.
HC determined the appeal delay was justifiable in a GST input tax credit dispute. The appellant had deposited pre-requisite amounts before formal appeal dismissal. Manual filing was permissible in December 2022 with no prohibition notifications. Electronic filing was impossible until the order's upload on GST portal on 17.01.2023. The appellant complied with Section 107(6b) of CGST Act by depositing Rs.82,000 in GST Electronic Cash Ledger and submitting via speed post. The Court condoned the delay, noting substantial compliance with statutory requirements including 10% pre-deposit of tax liability. The procedural delay was deemed insufficient grounds for dismissal given the appellant's efforts to meet statutory obligations. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
