Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR ruled that reimbursement of electricity charges collected on actual basis from sub-lessees is not subject to GST. The applicant, acting as a pure agent under Rule 33(a), merely recovers the exact electricity costs charged by electricity boards/DISCOMs from sub-lessees. Evidence showed the applicant's invoices matched the original electricity bills, demonstrating a pass-through arrangement. Following recent GST clarifications, property owners and managers collecting actual electricity costs are deemed pure agents for this supply. The reimbursement amount is excluded from the value of supply, and consequently, no GST liability arises on such electricity charge recoveries.
AAR ruled that reimbursement of electricity charges collected on actual basis from sub-lessees is not subject to GST. The applicant, acting as a pure agent under Rule 33(a), merely recovers the exact electricity costs charged by electricity boards/DISCOMs from sub-lessees. Evidence showed the applicant's invoices matched the original electricity bills, demonstrating a pass-through arrangement. Following recent GST clarifications, property owners and managers collecting actual electricity costs are deemed pure agents for this supply. The reimbursement amount is excluded from the value of supply, and consequently, no GST liability arises on such electricity charge recoveries.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
