Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT determined appellant's entitlement to statutory interest under Notification No. 25/2003-Cus(N.T.) for delayed refund credit, following precedent set in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. case. While interest was granted as compensatory relief under statutory provisions, additional compensation claim was rejected due to dispute between Resolution Professional and Official Liquidator. Tribunal clarified its limitations as statutory body under Customs Act, 1962, noting inability to grant extra-statutory compensation. Interest payment ordered specifically for delay period in crediting refund amount to appellant's account, with appeal partially allowed. Decision reinforces distinction between statutory interest entitlement and non-statutory compensation claims in customs matters.
CESTAT determined appellant's entitlement to statutory interest under Notification No. 25/2003-Cus(N.T.) for delayed refund credit, following precedent set in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. case. While interest was granted as compensatory relief under statutory provisions, additional compensation claim was rejected due to dispute between Resolution Professional and Official Liquidator. Tribunal clarified its limitations as statutory body under Customs Act, 1962, noting inability to grant extra-statutory compensation. Interest payment ordered specifically for delay period in crediting refund amount to appellant's account, with appeal partially allowed. Decision reinforces distinction between statutory interest entitlement and non-statutory compensation claims in customs matters.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.