Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC determined that a petition under IBC Section 10-A was not maintainable where default continued beyond the COVID-19 moratorium period. While Section 10-A prohibits CIRP initiation for defaults occurring between March 25, 2020, and subsequent six months (extendable up to one year), this protection does not extend to continuing defaults beyond the moratorium. The proviso barring future CIRP applications applies strictly to defaults during the specified period. Where default persisted after moratorium expiry, NCLT retained jurisdiction to entertain CIRP petitions. The court rejected the argument that Section 10-A bars proceedings even for continuing defaults and found no jurisdictional error in NCLT entertaining such matters. Petition dismissed, affirming NCLT's authority.
HC determined that a petition under IBC Section 10-A was not maintainable where default continued beyond the COVID-19 moratorium period. While Section 10-A prohibits CIRP initiation for defaults occurring between March 25, 2020, and subsequent six months (extendable up to one year), this protection does not extend to continuing defaults beyond the moratorium. The proviso barring future CIRP applications applies strictly to defaults during the specified period. Where default persisted after moratorium expiry, NCLT retained jurisdiction to entertain CIRP petitions. The court rejected the argument that Section 10-A bars proceedings even for continuing defaults and found no jurisdictional error in NCLT entertaining such matters. Petition dismissed, affirming NCLT's authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
