Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning service tax on payments made by appellant to overseas logistics agents. Tribunal held that pre-April 2006 demand of Rs. 11,97,047 was invalid as taxation of foreign services commenced only from April 18, 2006. For period until June 2012, following Intercontinental Consultants ruling, domestic components were non-taxable. Post-July 2012 liability was incorrectly imposed by overlooking government's position on transportation services. The adjudicating authority's valuation under Service Tax Rules was flawed as it failed to properly apply Rule 3 and Rule 5 of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006. Tribunal set aside the original order, ruling in appellant's favor.
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning service tax on payments made by appellant to overseas logistics agents. Tribunal held that pre-April 2006 demand of Rs. 11,97,047 was invalid as taxation of foreign services commenced only from April 18, 2006. For period until June 2012, following Intercontinental Consultants ruling, domestic components were non-taxable. Post-July 2012 liability was incorrectly imposed by overlooking government's position on transportation services. The adjudicating authority's valuation under Service Tax Rules was flawed as it failed to properly apply Rule 3 and Rule 5 of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006. Tribunal set aside the original order, ruling in appellant's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
