Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
HC condoned a 35-day delay in filing GST appeal, emphasizing that procedural delays should not override substantive justice. The petitioner had demonstrated compliance by depositing 10% of tax liability and making additional payments toward disputed amount. Court found strict application of GST Act's limitation provisions unwarranted given circumstances. Matter remanded to second respondent for fresh consideration on merits, directing full examination of facts and circumstances. Decision underscores judicial preference for substantive resolution over procedural dismissal in tax matters where appellant shows good faith compliance efforts.
HC condoned a 35-day delay in filing GST appeal, emphasizing that procedural delays should not override substantive justice. The petitioner had demonstrated compliance by depositing 10% of tax liability and making additional payments toward disputed amount. Court found strict application of GST Act's limitation provisions unwarranted given circumstances. Matter remanded to second respondent for fresh consideration on merits, directing full examination of facts and circumstances. Decision underscores judicial preference for substantive resolution over procedural dismissal in tax matters where appellant shows good faith compliance efforts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
