Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC denied bail to applicant charged with wrongful availing of Input Tax Credit. Despite applicant's willingness to repay and previous bail grant in a similar case, multiple FIRs for comparable offenses have been registered. The earlier bail was granted after three months' imprisonment where investigation was complete. In contrast, the current FIR dated 27.11.2024 remains under active investigation. Court distinguished present case from previous bail order (Criminal Misc. Application No.22792/2024) due to ongoing investigation and emergence of multiple similar offenses post-registration of initial FIR. Court declined to exercise judicial discretion, citing these material differences.
HC denied bail to applicant charged with wrongful availing of Input Tax Credit. Despite applicant's willingness to repay and previous bail grant in a similar case, multiple FIRs for comparable offenses have been registered. The earlier bail was granted after three months' imprisonment where investigation was complete. In contrast, the current FIR dated 27.11.2024 remains under active investigation. Court distinguished present case from previous bail order (Criminal Misc. Application No.22792/2024) due to ongoing investigation and emergence of multiple similar offenses post-registration of initial FIR. Court declined to exercise judicial discretion, citing these material differences.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.