Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
HC denied bail to applicant charged with wrongful availing of Input Tax Credit. Despite applicant's willingness to repay and previous bail grant in a similar case, multiple FIRs for comparable offenses have been registered. The earlier bail was granted after three months' imprisonment where investigation was complete. In contrast, the current FIR dated 27.11.2024 remains under active investigation. Court distinguished present case from previous bail order (Criminal Misc. Application No.22792/2024) due to ongoing investigation and emergence of multiple similar offenses post-registration of initial FIR. Court declined to exercise judicial discretion, citing these material differences.
HC denied bail to applicant charged with wrongful availing of Input Tax Credit. Despite applicant's willingness to repay and previous bail grant in a similar case, multiple FIRs for comparable offenses have been registered. The earlier bail was granted after three months' imprisonment where investigation was complete. In contrast, the current FIR dated 27.11.2024 remains under active investigation. Court distinguished present case from previous bail order (Criminal Misc. Application No.22792/2024) due to ongoing investigation and emergence of multiple similar offenses post-registration of initial FIR. Court declined to exercise judicial discretion, citing these material differences.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
