Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
NCLAT upheld the classification of appellant as a related party to the Corporate Debtor based on operational and financial interdependence established through the User Operated Maintenance Agreement (UOMA). The tribunal found that the appellant's attempt to terminate the agreement with one month's notice instead of the contractually required three months was invalid, as terms could not be modified without written consent. The interdependence demonstrated through the UOMA was sufficient to establish a related party relationship under the IBC framework. Appeal dismissed due to lack of merit in challenging the original classification.
NCLAT upheld the classification of appellant as a related party to the Corporate Debtor based on operational and financial interdependence established through the User Operated Maintenance Agreement (UOMA). The tribunal found that the appellant's attempt to terminate the agreement with one month's notice instead of the contractually required three months was invalid, as terms could not be modified without written consent. The interdependence demonstrated through the UOMA was sufficient to establish a related party relationship under the IBC framework. Appeal dismissed due to lack of merit in challenging the original classification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.