Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
HC upheld validity of assessment order under s.147 read with s.144B, finding proper approval under s.151. Court confirmed Range Head and CIT/PCIT had appropriately endorsed AO's recorded reasons for scrutiny notice under s.148. Review of computerized order details demonstrated requisite approvals obtained at each stage of faceless assessment. Finding no jurisdictional error, HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction. Petitioner directed to pursue statutory appeal remedy for AY 2013-14, with time spent in writ proceedings eligible for consideration in any delay condonation application.
HC upheld validity of assessment order under s.147 read with s.144B, finding proper approval under s.151. Court confirmed Range Head and CIT/PCIT had appropriately endorsed AO's recorded reasons for scrutiny notice under s.148. Review of computerized order details demonstrated requisite approvals obtained at each stage of faceless assessment. Finding no jurisdictional error, HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction. Petitioner directed to pursue statutory appeal remedy for AY 2013-14, with time spent in writ proceedings eligible for consideration in any delay condonation application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
