Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that gains from sale of trademarks "Coldarin" and "Raricap" acquired prior to 01/04/1998 qualify as Long Term Capital Gains, not Short Term Capital Gains. Section 50 was inapplicable as intangible assets were not part of depreciable block assets before Finance Act 1998 amendment. Since the trademarks were acquired in FY 1992-93 and 1997-98 when no statutory provision mandated inclusion of intangibles in block assets, depreciation provisions under Section 50 cannot apply. ITAT overturned lower authorities' treatment of gains as STCG, ruling in appellant's favor to classify proceeds as LTCG for tax purposes.
ITAT held that gains from sale of trademarks "Coldarin" and "Raricap" acquired prior to 01/04/1998 qualify as Long Term Capital Gains, not Short Term Capital Gains. Section 50 was inapplicable as intangible assets were not part of depreciable block assets before Finance Act 1998 amendment. Since the trademarks were acquired in FY 1992-93 and 1997-98 when no statutory provision mandated inclusion of intangibles in block assets, depreciation provisions under Section 50 cannot apply. ITAT overturned lower authorities' treatment of gains as STCG, ruling in appellant's favor to classify proceeds as LTCG for tax purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
