Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT affirmed NCLT's jurisdiction to address pre-CIRP dues refund applications under Section 60(5)(c). The tribunal held that all pre-CIRP claims were extinguished upon resolution plan approval, where appellant's claim of 2,32,13,387 was settled for 4,64,003. The respondent's request for refund of pre-CIRP payments was granted, as these payments were made under duress to maintain electricity supply. The tribunal emphasized that post-resolution plan approval, no additional pre-CIRP claims could be entertained, following precedents from SC judgments in Paschimanchal Vidyut and Ghanshyam Mishra cases. The appellant was barred from recovering any pre-CIRP dues beyond the approved resolution plan amount.
NCLAT affirmed NCLT's jurisdiction to address pre-CIRP dues refund applications under Section 60(5)(c). The tribunal held that all pre-CIRP claims were extinguished upon resolution plan approval, where appellant's claim of 2,32,13,387 was settled for 4,64,003. The respondent's request for refund of pre-CIRP payments was granted, as these payments were made under duress to maintain electricity supply. The tribunal emphasized that post-resolution plan approval, no additional pre-CIRP claims could be entertained, following precedents from SC judgments in Paschimanchal Vidyut and Ghanshyam Mishra cases. The appellant was barred from recovering any pre-CIRP dues beyond the approved resolution plan amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.