Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Concurrent anticipatory-bail jurisdiction permits applications before either forum, while secured evidence may negate custodial interrogation in GST e...
Page of 4899
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 97978 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed an application seeking condonation of 115-day delay in refiling a company appeal. The appellant's explanations regarding inability to physically inspect records due to geographical location and delays in obtaining certified copies were deemed insufficient. The tribunal noted that the certified copy was obtained on the same day of application (09.12.2024), contradicting claims of procedural delays. Given IBC's emphasis on timely resolution and the one-year timeline for liquidation processes, the tribunal found the appellant's approach nonchalant and the reasons for delay perfunctory. The delay was deemed detrimental to the liquidation process's integrity, resulting in rejection of the condonation application and subsequent dismissal of the appeal.
NCLAT dismissed an application seeking condonation of 115-day delay in refiling a company appeal. The appellant's explanations regarding inability to physically inspect records due to geographical location and delays in obtaining certified copies were deemed insufficient. The tribunal noted that the certified copy was obtained on the same day of application (09.12.2024), contradicting claims of procedural delays. Given IBC's emphasis on timely resolution and the one-year timeline for liquidation processes, the tribunal found the appellant's approach nonchalant and the reasons for delay perfunctory. The delay was deemed detrimental to the liquidation process's integrity, resulting in rejection of the condonation application and subsequent dismissal of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.