Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed an application seeking condonation of 115-day delay in refiling a company appeal. The appellant's explanations regarding inability to physically inspect records due to geographical location and delays in obtaining certified copies were deemed insufficient. The tribunal noted that the certified copy was obtained on the same day of application (09.12.2024), contradicting claims of procedural delays. Given IBC's emphasis on timely resolution and the one-year timeline for liquidation processes, the tribunal found the appellant's approach nonchalant and the reasons for delay perfunctory. The delay was deemed detrimental to the liquidation process's integrity, resulting in rejection of the condonation application and subsequent dismissal of the appeal.
NCLAT dismissed an application seeking condonation of 115-day delay in refiling a company appeal. The appellant's explanations regarding inability to physically inspect records due to geographical location and delays in obtaining certified copies were deemed insufficient. The tribunal noted that the certified copy was obtained on the same day of application (09.12.2024), contradicting claims of procedural delays. Given IBC's emphasis on timely resolution and the one-year timeline for liquidation processes, the tribunal found the appellant's approach nonchalant and the reasons for delay perfunctory. The delay was deemed detrimental to the liquidation process's integrity, resulting in rejection of the condonation application and subsequent dismissal of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.