Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
NCLAT upheld NCLT's decision to admit Corporate Debtor into CIRP under Section 7 of IBC, 2016. The Corporate Debtor's challenge regarding improper notice service was rejected as notice was effectively served through multiple channels including newspaper publications, speed post, and email. The debt and default were verified through Information Utility (NeSL) records, with authenticated default submission showing no response from Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found all essential requirements for Section 7 admission were met: existence of debt, default in repayment, and application within limitation period. Corporate Debtor's non-commitment to debt repayment during proceedings further supported the admission decision. Appeal dismissed, confirming validity of CIRP initiation.
NCLAT upheld NCLT's decision to admit Corporate Debtor into CIRP under Section 7 of IBC, 2016. The Corporate Debtor's challenge regarding improper notice service was rejected as notice was effectively served through multiple channels including newspaper publications, speed post, and email. The debt and default were verified through Information Utility (NeSL) records, with authenticated default submission showing no response from Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found all essential requirements for Section 7 admission were met: existence of debt, default in repayment, and application within limitation period. Corporate Debtor's non-commitment to debt repayment during proceedings further supported the admission decision. Appeal dismissed, confirming validity of CIRP initiation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.