Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC upheld rejection of rectification application filed under Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Following precedent set in Hongo India Pvt Ltd case, court affirmed that statutory time limits for rectification applications cannot be extended beyond six months prescribed period. Post-2002 amendment reduced time limit from four years to six months for rectification of apparent mistakes in Tribunal orders. Tribunal lacks discretionary power to condone delays beyond statutory period, as Section 5 of Limitation Act remains excluded. Absence of explicit provision for condonation of delay in Section 35C(2) means strict adherence to six-month limitation. Appeal dismissed as Tribunal acted within jurisdictional bounds in rejecting time-barred application.
HC upheld rejection of rectification application filed under Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Following precedent set in Hongo India Pvt Ltd case, court affirmed that statutory time limits for rectification applications cannot be extended beyond six months prescribed period. Post-2002 amendment reduced time limit from four years to six months for rectification of apparent mistakes in Tribunal orders. Tribunal lacks discretionary power to condone delays beyond statutory period, as Section 5 of Limitation Act remains excluded. Absence of explicit provision for condonation of delay in Section 35C(2) means strict adherence to six-month limitation. Appeal dismissed as Tribunal acted within jurisdictional bounds in rejecting time-barred application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
