Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT determined two distinct service classifications under separate agreements with CONCOR. Under the first agreement for terminal handling, the service was classified as "supply of tangible goods" based on hiring of reach stackers at fixed rates, not cargo handling. For the second agreement involving cargo operations, the tribunal remanded the matter regarding service tax liability on export cargo for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authority must reconsider the case after allowing appellant to submit additional evidence within 6 weeks to substantiate claims about export cargo handling and challenge the extended limitation period. The appeal was partially allowed through remand, with clear distinction maintained between supply of equipment and actual cargo handling services.
CESTAT determined two distinct service classifications under separate agreements with CONCOR. Under the first agreement for terminal handling, the service was classified as "supply of tangible goods" based on hiring of reach stackers at fixed rates, not cargo handling. For the second agreement involving cargo operations, the tribunal remanded the matter regarding service tax liability on export cargo for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authority must reconsider the case after allowing appellant to submit additional evidence within 6 weeks to substantiate claims about export cargo handling and challenge the extended limitation period. The appeal was partially allowed through remand, with clear distinction maintained between supply of equipment and actual cargo handling services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.