Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeals for AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 regarding tax assessment on principal damages and interest additions. While assessee filed Form-1 under DTVSV for both years, the designated authority failed to process them within statutory timeline under Section 92(1). The disputed interest amounts were already declared and taxed in AY 2019-20, evidenced by Form-2. Since tax payment was completed in AY 2019-20 and Form-1 applications for earlier years lapsed due to non-processing within prescribed period, ITAT held revenue's appeals infructuous. The tribunal emphasized that revenue did not controvert assessee's evidence of tax payment or the expiry of Form-1 processing deadline.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeals for AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 regarding tax assessment on principal damages and interest additions. While assessee filed Form-1 under DTVSV for both years, the designated authority failed to process them within statutory timeline under Section 92(1). The disputed interest amounts were already declared and taxed in AY 2019-20, evidenced by Form-2. Since tax payment was completed in AY 2019-20 and Form-1 applications for earlier years lapsed due to non-processing within prescribed period, ITAT held revenue's appeals infructuous. The tribunal emphasized that revenue did not controvert assessee's evidence of tax payment or the expiry of Form-1 processing deadline.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
