Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT found AO's calculation of undisclosed income from alleged bogus share purchases to be incorrect. While the broker's contract note was suspended by NSE, no allegations were made against sale transactions or declared profits. The CIT(A)'s deletion of excess addition was upheld. Following precedent from jurisdictional HC in similar cases where 12.5% of bogus purchases was deemed reasonable, ITAT determined the addition confirmed by CIT(A) was unwarranted. The assessee's appeal was allowed, resulting in complete deletion of the disputed addition. The tribunal emphasized that when sales and profits are accepted, merely questioning purchase transactions without substantial evidence is insufficient for sustaining additions.
ITAT found AO's calculation of undisclosed income from alleged bogus share purchases to be incorrect. While the broker's contract note was suspended by NSE, no allegations were made against sale transactions or declared profits. The CIT(A)'s deletion of excess addition was upheld. Following precedent from jurisdictional HC in similar cases where 12.5% of bogus purchases was deemed reasonable, ITAT determined the addition confirmed by CIT(A) was unwarranted. The assessee's appeal was allowed, resulting in complete deletion of the disputed addition. The tribunal emphasized that when sales and profits are accepted, merely questioning purchase transactions without substantial evidence is insufficient for sustaining additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
