Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
HC held that CENVAT credit transition from JVAT Act to JGST Act cannot be denied based on ineligibility under the repealed law. Following precedent in prior case, court determined GST authorities lack jurisdiction to adjudicate eligibility of credits under former regime. Credits' eligibility must be evaluated under provisions of erstwhile Act. The impugned adjudication order and subsequent appellate order were quashed, allowing petitioner's transition of input tax credits into GST system. This ruling affirms that migration to GST cannot be blocked solely due to disputed credit eligibility under previous tax framework.
HC held that CENVAT credit transition from JVAT Act to JGST Act cannot be denied based on ineligibility under the repealed law. Following precedent in prior case, court determined GST authorities lack jurisdiction to adjudicate eligibility of credits under former regime. Credits' eligibility must be evaluated under provisions of erstwhile Act. The impugned adjudication order and subsequent appellate order were quashed, allowing petitioner's transition of input tax credits into GST system. This ruling affirms that migration to GST cannot be blocked solely due to disputed credit eligibility under previous tax framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
