Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding denial of exemption under section 11 of Income Tax Act. While the return was not filed within time prescribed under section 139(1), it was filed before the extended deadline under section 139(4A). Following binding CBDT Circular No.173/193/2019, which directs rectification of section 143(1)(a) orders and related demands in such cases, ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order. Matter remanded to CIT(A) for passing rectification order as per CBDT guidelines. The ruling establishes that belated returns filed within section 139(4A) timeline qualify for exemption, provided other conditions are met.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding denial of exemption under section 11 of Income Tax Act. While the return was not filed within time prescribed under section 139(1), it was filed before the extended deadline under section 139(4A). Following binding CBDT Circular No.173/193/2019, which directs rectification of section 143(1)(a) orders and related demands in such cases, ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order. Matter remanded to CIT(A) for passing rectification order as per CBDT guidelines. The ruling establishes that belated returns filed within section 139(4A) timeline qualify for exemption, provided other conditions are met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
