Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld partial rejection of books under s.145(3) due to unverifiable self-made cash vouchers, though specific quantification was lacking. Given turnover of Rs.4,00,48,401 showing only 4% variance from previous year, ITAT confirmed addition of Rs.1,00,000 despite assessee's tax audit report and claimed receipted vouchers. On interest income from JSPL reflected under business income, matter remanded to AO for verification whether funds were invested for business expediency rather than mere surplus fund investment to determine appropriate head of income classification between business income versus income from other sources. Addition sustained but limited to Rs.1,00,000 considering overall circumstances and to end protracted litigation.
ITAT upheld partial rejection of books under s.145(3) due to unverifiable self-made cash vouchers, though specific quantification was lacking. Given turnover of Rs.4,00,48,401 showing only 4% variance from previous year, ITAT confirmed addition of Rs.1,00,000 despite assessee's tax audit report and claimed receipted vouchers. On interest income from JSPL reflected under business income, matter remanded to AO for verification whether funds were invested for business expediency rather than mere surplus fund investment to determine appropriate head of income classification between business income versus income from other sources. Addition sustained but limited to Rs.1,00,000 considering overall circumstances and to end protracted litigation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.