Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT affirmed customs duty liability and penalty against custodian for pilfered imported refrigerant gas cylinders while in custody. Following precedent from Delhi HC, tribunal held custodian responsible u/s 45 of Customs Act read with Regulation 6 of Handling of Cargo Regulations for safe custody until clearance. Show cause notice issued on 18.12.2013 was within limitation period from discovery of pilferage on 27.06.2013. Penalty u/s 117 upheld as custodian failed safekeeping obligations. Appellant's duty liability confirmed since goods requiring NOC from Chief Controller of Explosives were documented present during first check but subsequently found missing from sealed container.
CESTAT affirmed customs duty liability and penalty against custodian for pilfered imported refrigerant gas cylinders while in custody. Following precedent from Delhi HC, tribunal held custodian responsible u/s 45 of Customs Act read with Regulation 6 of Handling of Cargo Regulations for safe custody until clearance. Show cause notice issued on 18.12.2013 was within limitation period from discovery of pilferage on 27.06.2013. Penalty u/s 117 upheld as custodian failed safekeeping obligations. Appellant's duty liability confirmed since goods requiring NOC from Chief Controller of Explosives were documented present during first check but subsequently found missing from sealed container.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
